The polluted Goat

stresses: 0 0/1/0 1

pos: dt jj nn

tokens: the polluted goat

phonemes: dh-ah p-ah-l-uw-t-ah-d g-ow-t

syllables: dh-ah p-ah/l-uw/t-ah-d g-ow-t

Advertisements

We agreed yes pulls

First person conversation

a. My friend Of earth.
b. When you think of a friend, what comes to mind? Elaborating on it. earth.
a. To disagree on Of earth.
b. Clearly. on the matter of earth.
a. OK Card with a laugh.
b. In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following, Ok? laugh.
a. You see? Card with a laugh.
b. Why do you care whether I see? card with a laugh.? laugh.
a. Because
b. We have already seen that regarding laugh.
a. listen Card with a laugh.
b. of course laughs
a. No? Purcell.
b. Analogously Purcells
a. This is a fact, I say
b. What was your thoughtabout this fact? Purcell.
a. my my Purcell.
b. Let us continue to suppose that although Purcell.
a. Let’s move on Purcell.
b. Bloody fuck! regarding Purcell.
a. I agree
b. Didn’t I tell you that before? half
a. To disagree
b. Shit. clearly half
a. This is a fact, I say How half
b. Tell me more about this fact. Agreed half
a. was How half
b. A consequence of the approach just outlined is that half
a. Paradoxically, yes.
b. For one thing. Ok? sell.
a. To disagree Cocked sideways i wouldnt sell.
b. On the other hand. Ok sell.
a. Why can’t I? Cocked sideways i wouldnt sell.
b. Why don’t you tell me the reason why can’t i? cocked sideways wouldnt sell.? Ok? sell.
a. yes Cocked sideways i wouldnt sell.
b. Ok? sells
a. I don’t Watercarrier, or well wool.
b. Don’t you really watercarrier, or well wool.? Ok? wool.
a. Why can’t I? Watercarrier, or well wool.
b. Why do you think can’t i? watercarrier, or well wool.? concerning wool.
a. meanwhile Watercarrier, or well wool.
b. However, this assumption is not correct, since wool.
a. mother Watercarrier, or well wool.
b. That clarifies things a bit. mother watercarrier, or well wool.? conversely wool.
a. Are you Coopfattened their.
b. I may be coopfattened their. — what do you think?
a. I feel sorry for
b. However, this assumption is not correct, since their.
a. yes Coopfattened their.
b. Summarizing, then, we assume that Interesting! their.
a. I agree Coopfattened their.
b. For one thing. Analogously their.
a. Good
b. Summarizing, then, we assume that Indeed pull
a. am And ancient and a pull
b. If the position of word were only relatively inaccessible to movement, yes pull
a. We agreed!
b. Yes pulls

She read online:

2ndaPink1nda@ss https://t.co/MQsxfjGlif … creating and remembering a memory. How well something has been certified 16 times over in platinum around the world. [17] [221] People named her one of these continuation guillemets in HTML/CSS and in nuance of how assured the person I love? HTTP * Persistence * Compression * HTTPS Request methods * OPTIONS * GET * HEAD * POST * PUT * DELETE * TRACE * CONNECT * PATCH Header fields * Cookie * ETag * Location * HTTP referer * DNT * X-Forwarded-For codes. @TheRealSchitty: Might as well test it out…

Chat support exchange is so awful. “You have done a great job changing the password of your account”. Ugh, shut up and FIX THIS! Highly synthetic languages, copulas show more resemblances to pronouns, as in Japanese. Some linguists believe that 是 developed into a simple contraction of the Year, and 21 was named Songwriter of the communication, though not the certificate holder is the president of the form “A is B.” Examples: 私は学生だ。 Watashi wa gakusei da. “I’m a feminist, I believe that everyone should be written $$. * In the late 2000s and early 2010s, HTTPS began to see widespread use for protecting authenticity.

Image

Radial pull and a prisoner…

line-000001
c. pull of earthling

“Deny Yourself. Why not try it this way? Please tell me more, is, however, much criticism of this act is to cause great shame.The most common technique used by US forces in Iraq when interrogating prisoners. It involves stripping prisoners in front of other prisoners and forcing them to remain naked for long periods of time. The technique has also been used, including one case of a crime that could not be disproved, such as those of doctor/patient, teacher/pupil or parent/child. For example: Doctor: Are you sleeping well? Patient: No, @ Doctor: Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. Lies you tell.” https://t.co/1OsmbBTxkM

import os, sys; sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), "..", ".."))
from pattern.web import Wikipedia
import time

from pattern.web import Twitter

import nltk

# Another way to mine Twitter is to set up a stream.
# A Twitter stream maintains an open connection to Twitter,
# and waits for data to pour in.
# Twitter.search() allows us to look at older tweets,
# Twitter.stream() gives us the most recent tweets.

# It might take a few seconds to set up the stream.
stream = Twitter().stream("password", timeout=30)

#wikipedia
engine = Wikipedia(language="en")

#while True:
for i in range(5):
    print i
    # Poll Twitter to see if there are new tweets.
    stream.update()
    # The stream is a list of buffered tweets so far,
    # with the latest tweet at the end of the list.
    for tweet in reversed(stream):
        answer = tweet.text
        #print tweet.language
    # Clear the buffer every so often.
    stream.clear()
    # Wait awhile between polls.
    time.sleep(1)

print answer
words = nltk.word_tokenize(answer)
print words
#answered = answer[:0]

#print answered

#article = engine.search()

Every variable is the sign for a formal concept. For every variable represents a constant form that all its values possess, and this can be regarded as a formal property of those values. It proved, incontrovertibly, the disastrous effects of machinery and division of labour; the concentration of capital and land in a few hands; overproduction and crises; it pointed out the inevitable ruin of the petty bourgeois and peasant, the misery of the proletariat, the anarchy in production, the crying inequalities in the distribution of wealth, the industrial war of extermination between nations, the dissolution of old moral bonds, of the old family relations, of the old nationalities.

In its positive aims, however, this form of Socialism aspires either to restoring the old means of production and of exchange, and with them the old property relations, and the old society, or to cramping the modern means of production and of exchange, within the framework of the old property relations that have been, and were bound to be, exploded by those means.  In either case, it is both reactionary and Utopian.

Its last words are: corporate guilds for manufacture, patriarchal relations in agriculture.

Ultimately, when stubborn historical facts had dispersed all intoxicating effects of self-deception, this form of Socialism ended in a miserable fit of the blues.
Its true: in a few hundred thousand years someone from another galaxy may look with pity upon the agony of our time on this planet taken hostage by the dogma of capitalism. In trying to understand what happened and why, this extra-terrestrial intelligence will be astonished by our incredible mixture of technological refinement and extreme moral stupidity. This book will help the extraterrestrial to find some meaning, or at least
some explanations.

8-ball

RT @Funnny_Piccs: Her: play me in 8-ball for your password

Me: https://t.co/tTZOLRSFy7 Pass me some seconds unless it is not the certificate authority or its predecessor, the now-deprecated protocol SPDY), that are new generations of HTTP, designed to reduce page load times and latency. It is recommended to use an added encryption layer (SSL/TLS) is sufficiently secure against eavesdroppers. HTTPS is that it is a pen.” (lit., this beer TOPIC be-tasty) このビールはおいしいです。 Kono bīru wa oishii. “This beer is delicious.” (lit., this beer TOPIC be-tasty) このビールはおいしいです。 Kono bīru wa oishii. “This beer is delicious.” This!

goat-001350
d. moral mother

Crawling the goat

The “you polluted so we will” argument is less prevalent than it was when you were a GOAT Mr Jones.
#bbcdp
Tue Nov 29 12:40:54 +0000 2016
[u’#bbcdp’]
1
Total results: 1
803579488856576000
#bbcdp…………………………………………………………………………………

Hmm. That could be the problem.

A consequence of the approach just outlined is that it indicates all sorts of things: that the mind is alive and quick is not quite equivalent to the year when heroes faded. On the other hand, we are finishing it off in their own minds, raising serious doubts about and started believing only in the infinite proliferation of images. We have already seen that The word ‘no’ doesn’t appear or at all appears to correlate rather closely with the topic, subject of conversation; ‘the thing we’re on about’ or what we’re on about is…’; ‘what are you on about?’ With this clarification, the earlier discussion of deviance is not to be considered in determining, remember that it is the concept behind the terminology that matters. Note that the crying inequalities in the distribution of wealth, and believe it or not, people tend to be co-operative in conversations during the strong generative capacity of the theory. Analogously, a descriptively adequate grammar can work out its bearings at midnight without a candle conversation exhibiting a very wide range of styles, nuances and
linguistic strategies.

Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (fig b.) and (fig d.), we see that.  Let’s look at an example to see how repetition could be used persuasive and not subject to avoid saying ‘He or she uses an adverb (for example) to persuade the listener that…’. Conversely, probably used rhetoric without even realizing it they can prevent understanding if excessive the extended c-command discussed in connection with. For one thing, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier may remedy and, at the same time,
eliminate. The truth of the matter is that there is a great deal of mutual regulation in language use that allows for implication, ambiguity, trial and error and idiosyncratic variations of all kinds before exercising control. It may be, then, that the descriptive power of the base component ‘I don’t wish to discuss this’ the traditional practice of grammarians. So far, frequently observable in real-life conversations ‘I wondered why you were being so nice!’ an idea built on labor and social solidarity began to be dissipated by a rapid and predatory process of de-realization. Furthermore, in either case, it is both reactionary and Utopian. delimits the idea of adjacency pairs is interesting because it is a way of understanding two kinds of ebb and flow in a conversation. It appears that the natural general principle that will subsume this case ‘I think we are barking up the wrong tree’.
Parent: You’ve been playing in the mud again. If the position of the trace in (fig a.) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, the very act of not remaining silent is itself a sign of co-operation, is to be regarded as an abstract underlying order. However, this assumption is not correct, since the systematic use of complex symbols does not readily tolerate uncompleted sentences are frequently a sign of very fluent and co-operative talk. For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, a case of semi-grammaticalness of a different sort is rather different from a descriptive fact. We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: the fantasy dear to each fledgeling priest, suffices to account for a doctor: Hmm. That could be the problem.

Pollution.goat.n.01

pollution.n.01: undesirable state of the natural environment being contaminated with harmful substances as a consequence of human activities
befoulment.n.01: the state of being polluted
contamination.n.03: the act of contaminating or polluting; including (either intentionally or accidentally) unwanted substances or factors

goat.n.01: any of numerous agile ruminants related to sheep but having a beard and straight horns
butt.n.03: a victim of ridicule or pranks
capricorn.n.01: (astrology) a person who is born while the sun is in Capricorn
capricorn.n.03: the tenth sign of the zodiac; the sun is in this sign from about December 22 to January 19

ridicule.n.01: language or behavior intended to mock or humiliate
derision.n.02: the act of deriding or treating with contempt

prank.n.01: buffoonery.n.01: acting like a clown or buffoon
antic.n.01: a ludicrous or grotesque act done for fun and amusement

hoof.n.01: the foot of an ungulate mammal
hoof.n.02: the horny covering of the end of the foot in ungulate mammals

zodiac.n.01: a belt-shaped region in the heavens on either side to the ecliptic; divided into 12 constellations or signs for astrological purposes
zodiac.n.02: (astrology) a circular diagram representing the 12 zodiacal constellations and showing their signs

Variation on what could be the problem.

We have already seen that the descriptive power of the base component ‘I don’t wish to discuss this’ the idea of adjacency pairs is interesting because it is a way of understanding two kinds of ebb and flow in a conversation. If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is not subject to doctor: Hmm. That could be the problem. So far, let’s look at an example to see how repetition could be used persuasively raises serious doubts about avoid saying ‘He or she uses an adverb (for example) to persuade the listener that…’.

In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), the systematic use of complex symbols appears to correlate rather closely with conversations exhibit a very wide range of styles, nuances and linguistic strategies. It appears that in either case, it is both reactionary and Utopian. is to be regarded as The truth of the matter is that there is a great deal of mutual regulation in language use that allows for implication, ambiguity, trial and error and idiosyncratic variations of all kinds before exercising control. Let us continue to suppose that frequently observable in real-life conversations ‘I wondered why you were being so nice!’ an idea built on labor and social solidarity began to be dissipated by a rapid and predatory process of de- realization. By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier suffices to account for and started believing only in the infinite proliferation of images. Nevertheless, the earlier discussion of deviance may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate remember that it is the concept behind the terminology that matters.
From this, it follows that are finishing it off in their own minds does not readily tolerate a descriptive fact. This suggests that the crying inequalities in the distribution of wealth can be defined in such a way as to impose the strong generative capacity of the theory. Suppose, for instance, that the fantasy dear to each fledgeling priest. is not to be considered in determining the topic, subject of conversation; ‘the thing we’re on about’ or what we’re on about is…’; ‘what are you on about?’ On the other hand, the natural general principle that will subsume this case they can prevent understanding if excessive uncompleted sentences are frequently a sign of very fluent and co-operative talk.

Conversely, probably used rhetoric without even realizing it believe it or not, people tend to be co-operative in conversations and believe there to be an abstract underlying order. A consequence of the approach just outlined is that a descriptively adequate grammar is rather different from the traditional practice of usages. To characterize a logical level L, The word ‘no’ doesn’t appear at all ‘I think we are barking up the wrong tree’ the year when heroes faded. To provide a constituent structure for this, indicates all sorts of things: that the mind is alive and quick and that it can work out its bearings at midnight without a candle parent: You’ve been playing in the mud again. Thus the very act of not remaining silent is itself a sign of co-operation, delimits the extended c-command discussed in connection with the previous problem.